Define the claim
Keep the exact wording, its date, and its context. A sentence with several assertions may need more than one check.
From a claim to an evidence record.
The structure behind a Verity review: understand the question, examine the evidence, and make the conclusion traceable.
Find relevant evidence
Route the question toward suitable sources. A discovered link is a starting point; its relevance and support still need to be assessed.
Compare the findings
Consider support, disagreement, and missing context. Agreement between models is not a substitute for independent source evidence.
Explain the result
Keep the conclusion beside its written reasoning, source references, and unresolved questions. A missing result should remain visibly missing.
What changes from one review to the next?
The depth
A short factual check and a complex document require different amounts of work. The selected depth and account access shape the available review.
The evidence
Sources may be incomplete, unavailable, outdated, or in disagreement. Those limits matter as much as the supporting passages.
The outcome
Use the record returned for that request to see what actually ran. A description of the architecture does not establish that every component completed.
Read the reasoning, then decide.
Our methodology explains how to interpret a review.