Different questions.
A closer look at the source.
Six specialist workflows bring the right reference into view. Choose the kind of evidence your review needs.
Specialist workflows are in preview. Customer access is still being validated; submissions are not open yet.
Atticus
Read the words behind the citation.
Find a cited court opinion and check whether an exact quotation appears in the retrieved text. Keep the reference and its limits together.
Socratic
Follow the reference back to the work.
Resolve a DOI, inspect the scholarly record, and surface source-provided retraction information before you rely on a citation.
Vitals
Start with the study behind the statement.
Check a PubMed reference and its retraction metadata. Bring the actual record into a medical evidence review.
Sterling
Every number has a reporting period.
Trace a reported revenue figure to its issuer, SEC filing, and structured financial data. Inspect the context that makes two numbers comparable.
Cipher
Put a vulnerability in version context.
Look up a CVE and inspect the product and version conditions recorded by NVD. Keep missing configuration evidence explicit.
Mirage
Read the file’s provenance.
Inspect available Content Credentials in the actual media file. Understand what its provenance establishes and what remains unresolved.
Know what was checked.
These workflows have specific scopes. A matched reference, reported figure, or valid credential answers one part of a review. Read the evidence and unresolved questions before using the result.
Source availability varies. When a required record cannot be retrieved or matched, the review must say so. Verity does not currently publish a product-wide accuracy percentage.
How evidence becomes a review